Republicans argue against electronic Ohio ballot application

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) — Ohio's top election official acted reasonably when he barred counties from accepting absentee ballot applications electronically in the face of potential cyberthreats and a loosely worded law, lawyers for the state and Republicans argued in a court filing Wednesday.

Republican Secretary of State Frank LaRose's directive was also “consistent with more than a decade of bipartisan precedent,” according to groups including the Trump campaign, the Republican National Committee and the state GOP.

The filings in a state appellate court were submitted ahead of oral arguments scheduled Thursday in a lawsuit brought by the Ohio Democratic Party, alleging LaRose's order is unconstitutional.

A county judge temporarily blocked the order last week, characterizing it as arbitrary and unreasonable. Franklin County Common Pleas Judge Richard Frye ruled counties should be allowed to explore accepting ballot applications by electronic means, including by email or fax.

Enforcement of Frye's order was stayed, however, as the state appeals to Ohio's 10th Appellate District.

Lawyers for the Republican committees wrote that “emails can be vessels for cybersecurity threats, including ransomware,” and that such attacked could be “catastrophic.”

That argument mirrors one made by LaRose, who says he fears moving away from accepting the forms exclusively in person or by mail would risk outside interference in a critical presidential battleground.

The dangers of submitting an absentee application as an email attachment are a matter of debate in the case, however.

A group of computer information and engineering technology experts from several top U.S. universities said in a Tuesday filing that steps are available to Ohio's 88 county election boards to easily...