The Arizona Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a 200-word summary that abortion advocates used to collect signatures for a ballot measure is valid, clearing the way for voters to decide on the constitutional right to an abortion.
Under the measure, abortions would be allowed until an embryo or foetus could survive outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks. There are some exceptions for later-term abortions to save the mother's life or to protect her physical or mental health.
The decision comes on the heels of a Thursday ballot printing deadline in Arizona.
The Arizona Right to Life, the organisation that sued the ballot measure campaign, argued that the petition summary was misleading.
The high court justices rejected that argument, as well as the claim that the summary for the proposed amendment failed to mention it would overturn existing abortion laws if approved by voters.
We have noted that (r)easonable people can differ about the best way to describe a principal provision,
