What really happened with under-cover government agents on January 6 will be exposed by attorneys who defended Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and other defendants in court against the Left’s fabricated narrative about January 6, 2021.
A Thursday Twitter “Spaces” conference will be at 9:00 tonight on Twitter-X.
https://x.com/i/spaces/1BRJjwQQnZgxw/peek
Inspector General Horowitz of the U.S. Department of Justice issued a flimsy brochure on December 12 titled:
After 4 years, the government finally admitted that the FBI had at least 26 undercover informants or operatives (confidential human sources) in the crowd on January 6.
But during the court trials, attorneys defending January 6 Defendants were informed by the DOJ of far more than 26 agents infiltrating the crowd, as many as 200 by some official reports in court.
It became so absurd during the Proud Boys trial that liberal but traditional defense rights attorney Carmen Hernandez told Judge Timothy Kelly in open court that “I am not a confidential human source.” Defense attorney Nick Smith told the judge that he had asked his paralegal if she were a confidential human source. One attorney complained that there were more undercover FBI and DHS agents in the trial than Proud Boys defendants.
And why only the FBI? What about DHS? HSI? D.C. Metropolitan Police Department? Secret Service? CIA? Why limit the discussion only to the FBI? When Jeremy Brown was pressured to become an informant, his “Ring” doorbell camera records the government employees saying they were from “HSI” – not the FBI.
The I.G.’s December 12, 2024, “don’t rock the boat” fluff piece was a propaganda effort to cover up for the Government’s attack on conservative – but not leftist – demonstrators. Much of the 88 pages lack substance but present boilerplate context and descriptions of the OIG’s own review rather than what that review found.
However, the OIG inadvertently proved that the January 6 defendants were mostly innocent. The informants were embedded to report back to their handlers. What did they report? Nothing. There was no conspiracy, no plan. Witnesses in the trials confirmed that Trump demonstrators had no plans to attack the Capitol. “Ninety to ninety-five percent of these are one-off cases,” said a former senior law enforcement official with knowledge of the investigation.
Julie Kelly of America Greatness and Author of the Book “January 6” widely shared the reports of criminal defense attorneys that the attorneys requested this information during criminal trials over the last three-and-a-half (3 ½) years.
People who have been extensively involved in the J6 legal process—defendants, lawyers, researchers—are extremely skeptical of Horowitz finding of only 26 FBI CHSes
This from a defense attorney: pic.twitter.com/hG9RtAW5dp
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) December 12, 2024
This information was denied to defendants who sought witnesses to prove their innocence. The FBI and DOJ prosecutors responded by asserting that it was not possible to provide defense attorneys with any information about undercover agents or operatives, informants, or confidential human sources because there is not a database or list or records of them.
The Twitter space is being hosted by Montana Libertarian Party
The FBI just admitted in their Inspector General's report to having 26 undercover agents in the January 6 crowd. But what if that's just the tip of the iceberg?
Libertarian attorney @RogerRoots and activist paralegal Jonathan Moseley have delved deep into dozens of J6 cases,…
— Montana Libertarian Party (@Montana_LP) December 17, 2024
The post Twitter Space Will Expose Real Number of Undercover Agents on January 6, 2021 Hidden from IG Report – Proud Boys Attorney Roger Roots and Others to Participate, Thursday at 9 PM ET appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
