Ready to dive into the biggest HR controversies of 2024? Our ‘Year of Debate’ series explores the key topics that ignited intense industry discussions. From Gen to AI and DEI, this series provides HR leaders with the information and insights they need to stay ahead of the curve.
The battle lines are drawn as we enter 2025 as the return-to-office (RTO) debate continues to simmer between employers and employees with neither side ready to fully concede. A recent Resume.org survey of business leaders paints a picture of a workforce divided.
Key Findings:
What This Means for HR:
As we look ahead to the New Year, here’s HR Daily Advisor’s best RTO content.
Expert Q&A: Controversial Return-to-Office Mandates and the Future of Work
Amazon’s hardline policy on returning to the office or else is being met with resistance, and other companies are considering their options. In a recent Q&A released by the University of Tennessee, Knoxville’s Haslam College of Business, Tim Munyon, Ergen Professor in Business and Janet and Jeff Davis Faculty Fellow at the school, discussed the ramifications of RTO mandates for businesses and employees.
PwC to Use Employee Location Data to Police RTO
The battle over return-to-office (RTO) policies among employers has often been a bitter one with bad blood on both sides. Some employers believe workers are less productive and tend to slack off more when working remotely. Employees often resent what they see as heavy-handed RTO mandates, some of which threaten workers with loss of promotion opportunities or even with termination for failure to comply.
HR Works Podcast: Balancing Data with Decency in Layoffs and Return to Office (Part 1)
In part one of this two-part episode, Sam Naficy, CEO of Prodoscore, a leader in employee visibility and productivity intelligence software, discusses how to incentivize employees to return to office, the value of leveraging data to measure the success of a return to office policy and identifying areas for improvement, the importance of reimagining employee engagement and teams in a hybrid and remote environment, and more.
Measuring the Success of RTO Policies
According to a recent survey by Bamboo HR, 22% of HR departments admit they lack metrics to measure the success of their return-to-office (RTO) policies. Understanding how to effectively gauge the impact of RTO policies is crucial for HR professionals and people managers. Here, we explore how RTO goals can be measured and tracked.
Recent Survey Points to Growing Employee RTO Fears
The ongoing push for a return to the office has become a contentious issue in many workplaces. Employers, in an effort to reestablish pre-pandemic norms, are adopting various tactics, including withholding promotions, to compel staff back to office desks. This approach, however, is meeting resistance, with a significant 25% of employees considering leaving their jobs in response.
Some Business Leaders Welcome RTO-Driven Employee Attrition
We have previously discussed the potential trade-off between talent recruitment and retention on the one hand and Return-to-Office (RTO) policies on the other. Many employees have expressed a strong preference for remote work, with some stating they would rather quit than return to the office. This sentiment has raised concerns about the impact of RTO policies on employee morale and retention. However, recent data suggests that, for some companies, this might have been part of the plan all along.
A Surprising RTO Advocate: Zoom
It’s easy to look at the widespread and COVID-driven shift to remote work and the subsequent, post-COVID return-to-office (RTO) efforts by employers as a battle with clear divisions among key stakeholders. Employers want the perceived boost in productivity and greater collaboration that comes with on-site work. Employees want the flexibility and freedom that comes with remote work. Telecommunications technology companies want the profits that come with supporting a remote, dispersed workforce.
The post <strong>2024: A Year of Debate (RTO)</strong> appeared first on HR Daily Advisor.
