It's just interesting points that provide some credence how to our play has changed this year which aligns with the eye test.That's not my intention, and I'm not an expert, I just find it a bit disingenuous that pulp stats analysis gets churned out by writers, some that people pay for, often forthright and exacting, bold claims...
They're red tops masquerading as the Guardian or New York Times alot of the time.
Journalism used to be more than just fancy writing. More than opinion pieces. Doesn't need to be peer reviewed, but could be sub-edited.
Just something that annoys me and I think needs calling out, but never does, the same way we call bullshit on politicians using rubbery figures or rhetoric.
World's gone mad etc.
Statistics: Posted by Cantoffee — Fri Nov 29, 2024 3:54 pm
