THE daughter of Captain Tom Moore is STILL cashing in on his legacy – by using him to sell £3,500 life-coaching packages.
Hannah Ingram-Moore, 54, and husband Colin, 67, were blasted by a report today for pocketing a fortune on the back of Tom’s inspirational NHS fundraising.
But despite shamelessly marring his legacy, Ms Ingram-Moore is offering to help sort others’ lives out and achieve their “goals, objectives, and vision”.
Courses start with a £50 30-minute consultation followed by packages starting from £1,450 or £3,500 to provide “intuitive guidance” to “aid you in your journey”.
She writes: “ Hannah can help you move past the challenges you’re facing in your life and achieve the goals that have felt out of reach.
“She does this by listening intently, helping you see things in new ways, and providing you with practical tools and advice.
“Break through your blocks, fears and limiting beliefs. Address these with Hannah in sessions to start building your positive and successful future.
“Payment is required at the beginning of each agreed programme.”
THE SUN SAYS...
CAPTAIN Tom Moore led a life of unblemished selflessness.
He would be ashamed of his daughter’s obscene greed.
The public-spirited World War Two veteran became a national hero during Covid by raising almost £40million for the NHS with a sponsored walk aged 99.
It earned him a knighthood, the love of millions and even a chart-topping hit.
But it was perhaps fortunate Sir Tom never lived to see Hannah Ingram-Moore and husband Colin plunder his philanthropy as a get-rich-quick scheme.
The pair sickeningly pocketed vast sums, cashing in on his memory and giving next to nothing to the charity they set up in his name, as a Charity Commission probe confirms.
Hannah paid herself a lavish salary and built a spa.
What an appalling end to the most uplifting story of that bleak Covid era.
If the Ingram-Moores have a shred of decency they will hand every last remaining Pound to the charity a duped public thought it was funding.
HannahIngramMoore.com was still promoted her services using Captain Tom’s image, with Ms Ingram-Moore shamelessly taking credit for his words.
She wrote: “I was suddenly immersed in the world of authorship. I sat and listened to my father telling his story, crafting his words, and creating joy for every age group.”
According to her website, Ms Ingram-Moore is also planning to publish her own book to tell her “side of the story” claiming people stop her in the street to ask for one.
She wrote: “The book is for everyone that asked and for those that want to hear the firsthand story of life with Captain Tom, including the highs and lows.
“I am days away from completing that book and it will be on the bookshelves shortly.”
A Charity Commission report found the family plunder Captain Tom’s memory for their own benefit – pocketing a £1.5million book advance then giving none to his charity.
The report revealed that Ingram-Moore, blocked from paying herself a £150,000 salary as charity CEO – took £85,000 and reimbursed her firm with £80,000 in costs from the foundation.
The couple hoodwinked the public by promising royalties to the charity from its merchandise website.
The 30-page report published on Thursday came after a two-year inquiry.
It found the Ingram-Moores carried out repeated instances of misconduct.
These include:
Instead buyers were redirected to external sites where no commission to good causes was collected.
And they gave the charity £8,900 from a Capt Tom gin from profits thought to be well over £100,000.
Much of the money is thought to have been ploughed into an illegal luxury spa that had built in their garden using the Captain Tom Foundation charity name.
The couple have been banned from being trustees of charities – while the Captain Tom Foundation has even hinted it may take “action” to get back funds that should have been donated.
Incredibly, the Ingram-Moores whinged they had been treated “unfairly and unjustly” by the Charity Commission, accusing the watchdog of “selective storytelling”.
They said the two-year inquiry had taken a “serious toll” on the family’s health and described the process as “excessive”, adding that the charities watchdog had a “predetermined agenda”.
“True accountability demands transparency, not selective storytelling,” the statement said, adding that they “never took a penny” from public donations.
