Summary: Aircraft carriers, symbolizing national power and strategic mobility, carry hefty price tags, with the USS Gerald R. Ford costing $13 billion. These naval giants, escorted by formidable carrier battle groups, underscore the importance and complexity of modern naval warfare. A striking example of their vulnerability was demonstrated in 2005 when the Swedish HSMS Gotland submarine "sank" the USS Ronald Reagan in a drill, using stealth technology that baffled the U.S. Navy's defenses. This incident highlights the potential threats posed by smaller, technologically advanced submarines to even the most protected naval assets, underscoring a shifting paradigm in naval strategy and defense planning.
Aircraft carriers are the most expensive warships out there. The most advanced carrier in the world, the USS Gerald R. Ford, has a price tag of $13 billion. Although the extreme in the spectrum, this price tag isn’t too far from the average cost of an aircraft carrier, which is anywhere from $5 to $9 billion.
The hefty cost highlights the strategic and operational importance of aircraft carriers. Flattops can project power and foreign policy like few other weapon systems in the world. Indeed, it’s hard to find another warfighting tool that can bolster the morale of an ally or terrorize an adversary than the aircraft carrier.
Recognizing the importance of aircraft carriers, navies around the world never send them alone to combat. Instead, every aircraft carrier goes into war, leading a carrier battlegroup. In the case of the U.S. Navy, a carrier battle group can be comprised of guided-missile cruisers, guided-missile destroyers, submarines, and support vessels.
So, imagine if a cheap submarine somehow managed to sneak through an aircraft carrier’s defenses and sink it. Although a hypothetical scenario, it happened during a large-scale exercise when a Swedish submarine managed to “sink” an American aircraft carrier.
In 2005, the U.S. Navy was holding a large-scale anti-submarine warfare exercise off the West Coast. As part of the training regime, planners pitted the small Swedish HSMS Gotland was pitted against the USS Roland Reagan aircraft carrier and its battle group. To the surprise of all, though perhaps not its crew, the HSMS Gotland was able to penetrate the anti-submarine layers protecting the carrier, including helicopters and destroyers specifically looking for the sub, and land several simulated torpedoes “hits.” The planners concluded that the USS Roland Reagan would have sunk or suffered serious damage were the exercise real.
To make matters worse, the HSMS Gotland, a small diesel submarine, was able to replicate its feat several times over the span of two years, causing alarm in the naval community. If a small, cheap submarine could sink a multi-billion aircraft carrier protected by several anti-submarine layers, could Chinese or Russian submarines cripple the U.S. Navy in the event of a conflict?
The Swedish submarine cost just $100 million, a tiny amount compared to the $4.5 billion the USS Roland Reagan cost, not even including the price of the complete battle group. In addition, diesel submarines might be cheaper than nuclear-powered ones but are much nosier and can stay underwater for a smaller amount of time. However, the HSMS Gotland used Stirling engines, which were invented in the early 1800s, that made the submarine almost completely silent to enemy sonars, and thus invisible to even an aircraft carrier.
The Swedish submarine’s success was so profound that the U.S. Navy leased the vessel to conduct testing on how to counter such threats.
As near-peer competition with China increases and as Beijing is trying to assert its power in the Indo-Pacific, mainly through naval force, the lessons of the small HSMS Gotland are even more relevant.
Stavros Atlamazoglou is a seasoned defense journalist specializing in special operations and a Hellenic Army veteran (national service with the 575th Marine Battalion and Army HQ). He holds a BA from Johns Hopkins University and an MA from the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). His work has been featured in Business Insider, Sandboxx, and SOFREP. Email the author: Editor@nationalinterest.org.
