Low-code doesn’t mean low quality
There is a certain artistry to elegantly written computer code. Programmers pride themselves on the craftsmanship that goes into program design, including attention to detail and functionality. Superior craftsmanship also requires superior tools, which is why more developers are adopting low-code development solutions. They want to focus on application services, not the coding process.
Some argue that software stacks and low-code solutions are limited in their capabilities, reducing the elegance of coding to a series of sophisticated dialog boxes and drag-and-drop interfaces that offer limited functionality. Granted, no-code platforms make it easy to get the stack up and running to support back-office workflows, but what about supporting those outside the workflow? Does low-code offer the functionality and flexibility to support applications that fall outside the box?