The Supreme Court held that the non-appearance of accused Krishna Sharma before a court cannot be a ground for cancelling bail. The court stated that the parameters for granting bail and its cancellation are different. Bail can be cancelled if the person violates conditions or influences witnesses. The court set aside the high court's verdict that cancelled Sharma's bail, noting that there was no evidence of violation. Sharma's lawyer and Sharma himself could not attend the high court due to a traffic jam caused by VIP movement. The high court had ordered the cancellation of bail and the issuance of a non-bailable warrant for Sharma's apprehension.
