Just seen both incidents side by side. They are practically identical, the SPFL need to explain why the one in our game wasn't looked at and the one in the Hearts game was.
The film is there for all to see ... Vente gets to the ball first and falls over the diving keeper, not reviewed. The Sevco player gets to the ball first and falls over the diving keeper .. reviewed and penalty awarded. In both cases Vente and the Sevco player had no chance of keeping the ball in play after their touch on the ball, so that isn't a factor.
This isn't even a question of VAR reviewing the same incident and coming to different conclusions. This is VAR handed two incidents almost identical and deciding one wasn't worthy of consideration but the other was.
On Monday morning Hibs and Hearts should get together and publicly ask the same question of the SPFL .... If the incident in the Hibs game wasn't even worthy of review why was the one in the Hearts game?
We all know the bloody answer ... corrupt to the core.
