The difficulty businesses around the country have had finding and hiring workers has gained extensive media attention. Additionally, many readers likely have personal experience reading the “help wanted” signs at various retail or hospitality services while standing in a long line or waiting for their food.
Various economic and social conditions have combined to create the employee-friendly job market conditions often referred to as the Great Resignation, including the COVID-19 pandemic and associated government benefit packages, shifting consumer habits and worker burnout, among others.
But with so much focus on how important and difficult it has been to hire new workers, it’s critical for employers to not lose sight of the importance of retaining existing workers as well.
While employers would generally love to retain all of their current workforce, that’s easier said than done. Often, employers and managers who are so focused on the day-to-day operations of the business are caught off guard when an employee announces their departure, citing a list of grievances as they exit.
Fortunately, there are steps employers can take to help identify and address dissatisfaction before it reaches the point of resignation.
First, it’s important to drive home the importance of employee retention efforts. While recruitment often gets more attention, the fact is it’s considerably more expensive in most cases to hire new workers than it is to retain existing staff. Recruitment involves placing job ads, sifting through applications, resumes and cover letters, conducting interviews, background checks, onboarding, etc. It’s a time-consuming process that doesn’t even guarantee a new hire. (Just ask the countless restaurants and retail establishments desperately trying to hire staff.)
With existing staff, the target employee is already identified, has already been interviewed, hired, and onboarded. The company just needs to keep them on the team.
An hour spent on retaining a current employee, therefore, is likely to have a higher ROI than an hour spent recruiting a new employee.
One of the first steps in crafting a successful employee retention strategy is to understand why employees are leaving in the first place. In other words, what are the sources of employee disengagement and dissatisfaction?
“According to the Gallup 2022 State of the Workplace Survey, 32% of employees are considered engaged, while 18% are considered actively disengaged,” notes Mark Mears, Chief Growth Officer for LEAF Growth Ventures, LLC. “That leaves the remaining 50% in the ‘mushy middle’ where they could go either way,” he says. Since the pandemic, Mears indicates, a number of engagement elements have been negatively impacted, including:
These issues have led to a measurable decline in employee engagement and satisfaction.
While these may be the main reasons cited for disengagement, there may not always be clear and obvious tell-tales signs that issues exist, Mears said. This is especially true in an increasingly hybrid or remote work environment. To identify signs more proactively, Mears suggests watching for:
Jonathan Westover of Human Capital Innovations adds: “Some signs that managers should be alert to include a decrease in productivity, missed deadlines, absenteeism, lack of enthusiasm, and negative attitude. When managers observe these signs, they should take action to address the root cause of the problem. This may include engaging in a conversation with the employee to understand their concerns.”
While it’s important to spot the signs of dissatisfaction and take steps to address them, dissatisfaction can be a bit like a rabies infection—by the time the symptoms show up, it’s already too late.
“Once managers become aware of an employee being disgruntled, it may be too late,” says Karl Hebenstreit of Perform & Function, LLC. “The manager can attempt to re-engage the employee via a meaningful 1:1, and try to rectify the situation that way, but it may be too late.”
Often, Hebenstreit says, money is used as a means to keep an employee but, if the employee is truly disgruntled, the damage may already be done. It may, in fact, be best for the organization to have that negative energy out of the team or organization. In addition, he says, “if it’s just about money, it’s only a matter of time before someone else offers them more and they leave anyway.”
The key to prevent losing disgruntled employees is arguably to make sure they don’t become disgruntled in the first place. This can be a highly effective strategy, but it does require putting in the work early and consistently, not just when problems arise.
“Best practices for employee engagement include people managers holding meaningful, regular 1:1s with their direct reports, during which the direct report drives the agenda,” says Hebenstreit. “The outcomes of these 1:1s are for the managers to better understand each of their team members’ individual needs, aspirations, challenges, expectations, strengths, likes and dislikes, and motivators and demotivators. Knowing this crucial information about each of their team members can help managers prevent employee disengagement and disgruntlement.”
Managers are a key part of the retention equation, but they represent only a fraction of the staff any given employee will interact with on a regular basis, of course. Ensuring a collegial and friendly work environment is also an important retention strategy.
“Team-building exercises using frameworks like the Enneagram, where team members get to learn about their own and each other’s primary motivations, hot buttons to avoid, strengths/interests to leverage, and come up with norms/agreements on how to address potential blind spots, are key to helping create a more diverse and inclusive work environment, where employees and their managers get to know how to best understand, engage, and work with each other,” says Hebenstreit. “A manager’s ability to then use these insights with each of their team members will go a long way to ensure that they don’t get to the disgruntled phase.”
While there has understandably been a lot of focus on the challenges businesses have had hiring new staff, employee retention has proven to be a more cost-effective long-term staffing investment. The challenge is that so few managers and employers are focused on employee satisfaction and engagement that they often fail to see the signs of employee dissatisfaction until it’s too late.
Being alert to the early signs and focusing on creating and maintaining a positive, and supportive culture and climate can help organizations keep key talent on board.
Lin Grensing-Pophal is a Contributing Editor at HR Daily Advisor.
The post Addressing Disgruntled Employees: Before They Exit appeared first on HR Daily Advisor.
