Effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing teaching: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

by Jinhui Ni, Pei Wu, Xinlin Huang, Fangfang Zhang, Ze You, Qiaoling Chang, Li Liao

Introduction

Several teaching methods have been used in clinical nursing teaching to increase quality and efficiency, but disagreements over their effects persist. This study will evaluate the effects of five teaching methods in clinical nursing on nursing students’ knowledge, skill scores, learning satisfaction, and patients’ satisfaction.

Methods

We will conduct searches in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database (CNKI), China Biological literature database (CBM), Wanfang Database, and China Science and Technology Journal Database (CSTJ) up to April 2022. Relevant randomized controlled trials meeting the eligibility criteria will be included. And the study selection and data extraction will be independently screened for eligibility by two authors. The quality of evidence will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted using Rev Man, Stata, and R software. Statistical analyses including homogeneity tests, sensitivity analysis, transitivity tests, consistency tests, and publication bias will be completed.

Ethics and dissemination

No formal research ethics approval is required. The results will be disseminated to a peer-reviewed journal for publication.

Protocol registration number

INPLASY2021120040.