Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:
Fifita does not have the virus and remained in the bubble. His crime was to remove his GPS I am sure Kay doesn’t have the virus but must have been around someone who has within his family. To be technical his action could have put more team members at risk than Fifita, hence my question why an indefinite period for one when his offence one presumes would be 14 days isolation and not the other.
It is the ambiguity I question, if you know why please enlighten us. I wonder if Fifita’s salary is reduced or stopped during a breach like this.
On the subject of transfer fees why should we not demand one Castleford did for Gale and St Helens did for Richardson, so not quite so rare when it comes to what a club would consider to be a major part of their team.
You do realise the players are in a training and players bubble outside of that they are with their families unlike some other sports and countries. You really do seek to find a negative out of everything don't you. One of the most negative fans I have seen post across these boards.
Statistics: Posted by REDWHITEANDBLUE — Sat Aug 29, 2020 5:27 pm
