MPs have blasted expenses of dozens of hereditary peers amid fresh calls for the system to be abolished.
Fuming politicians lashed out at revelations the members, whose titles pass down through the generations, cost hundreds of thousands of pounds.
The bill comes to more than that for the life peers yet they show up even less.
Lord Palmer has claimed £216,673 since 2016 and voted just 58 times, while the Earl of Glasgow claimed £212,144 despite speaking in Parliament just 19 times.
Of 85 current hereditary peers in the Lords, all are white males and around half went to Eton.
At least four more hereditary peer “elections” are expected in the coming months, but have been put on pause due to Covid.
In a bizarre system, only certain peers on a waiting list can stand in the poll, and only those Lords members in the same political grouping as the departing peer vote.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson faced fresh calls last night from critics to bin the archaic system.
Labour’s shadow Justice Secretary David Lammy labelled them “one of the least representative groups in the country”.
Ex-Lib Dem boss Tim Farron said the system had “turned British democracy into a joke”.
He added: “The fact this group of mostly rich, privately educated men hold such a big say in running our country but have zero accountability to the public is utterly depressing.
“The financial cost to the taxpayer is enormous but nowhere near as big as the cost to our democracy.”
Labour’s leader in the Lords, Baroness Smith of Basildon, said there is cross-party support to outlaw the “embarrassment” of the by-elections but ministers repeatedly block it.
She claimed: “Progress could be made almost immediately if the Government were to signal support.”
A House of Lords spokesperson said: “All members, including those elected to serve as one of 92 hereditary peers, take their role seriously.”
GOT a story? RING The Sun on 0207 782 4104 or WHATSAPP on 07423720250 or EMAIL exclusive@the-sun.co.uk
